Hi.I'm looking at both options (A. all accomadation on 1 level on a footprint of about 17m x 15m or B. also a bungalow with converted attic space on a footprint of about 12m x 10m).I have 2 plans that I really like (although I'm leaning towards the single story,as it's got a slightly nicer/better layout).What I would like to toss around here is the cost of building both types.I have heard that most price by the square area of living area (maybe I'm wrong),as opposed to the footprint square area.Both houses would have roughly the same amount of floor area.So my question is which one would be the more expensive to build,any thoughts?
I would have thought that the single story bungalow would be more expensive than the dormer bungalow,as the foundations would be more expensive,as would the area of walls,windows and roof?
So is it true that most price on a square area and not
cheers,
gooner