P
Trent
With spreadbetting dont you have to lay out a price you think the shares will realise within a given period i.e. you cant just take a punt, ride the year out and sell at year end?
Past performance is no guide to future returns.I bought bank shares last year and they're up 20%. Asides from dropping .6% on purchase, probably another 1% on sale and paying cpital gains of 20% it was absolutely a worthwhile investment.
I think there are a lot more people out there oggling the 2006 returns who will hop in in 2007.
Is your opinion based on anything other than a hunch or past performance?Im going to borrow on bluechip shares as i reckon i can handle the potential loss but the potential to gain is stronger in my opinion if you choose relatively good shares.
I'd imagine you'll find it tough to get a loan for gambling purposes. However, I could be wrong in saying that.
In terms of a target return, you'll need to consider the following (assuming you purchase shares):
1. Stamp duty on ISEQ quoted stocks is 1% (UK, US is 0.5%)
Trent
With spreadbetting dont you have to lay out a price you think the shares will realise within a given period
That's correct Keentoinvest. Spreadbetting generally takes the form of bets closing every quarter (so your punt will be for less than 3 months), but can be as long as 6 months. You still have the option to roll the bet forward at the end of a quarter for an additional cost.
Or on ETFs - for example.There is no stamp duty on US shares.
A wing and a prayer!Past performance is no guide to future returns.
Thats right Clubman but hard to ignore!
Is your opinion based on anything other than a hunch or past performance?
Once again, past performance is no guide to future returns.however on the back of impressive past performance
A fool and his money...I am quite confident that it wont result in a loss that I cant cover and because I certainly dont anticipate a loss, I am willing to take a gamble!
'Fortune favours the brave'
Once again, past performance is no guide to future returns.
A fool and his money...
Just countering one cliché with a different one. However it is arguably an apt one in the context of somebody borrowing to invest in shares on a hunch/wing/prayer and based on past performance. They might be lucky but the risks (of losing more than your own money) are significant.Maybe a bit harsh ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?