How does running negative interest rates destroy the debt?
Borrowing costs below the rate of inflation.
In such an environment the IOUs that a government owe to its creditors can be repaid with currency that buys less than it did when the debt was first taken out, after adjusting for inflation at any point in time.
In such a situation when a creditor receives his/her capital sum back at the end of the bond duration, it will be worth far less in terms of what it can purchase.
In such an environment precious metals and equities will perform the best and hold up better v inflation.
Faber makes a great point along the lines of-
We may only see 5%-10% inflation or so going forward. This is much less than the 70s. However with interest rates so low at 1%-3% or so; the 'real' negative interest rate is significantly more than the 70s.
I believe that interest rates should be around the level of inflation or slightly higher. If anyone can enlighen the discussion on the relationship between inflation and bank interest rate it would be interesting to hear?
The West will likely have interest rates much lower than the inflation rate going forward. Also governments always lie and defraud the public on the true inflation rate through hudonic adjustments (falling electrical goods like i-pods going into the basket of goods to replace everything that rises in price - oil, food, insurance, etc).
Hence we could infact experiencing higher inflation in 'real' terms than we did in the 70s.
Bonds and cash will be destroyed in such an environment.
It may not happen for years in the likes of Ireland where major deflation is still taking its course. Nonethless in the UK it is already occuring.
Inflation of 3-3.5% and the best a bank will give you in interest is 2% or so. There are odd bank account in line with the current inflation rate but the majority well under.
So in the UK currently, bond and cash holders are paying the government a rate of 1% or so to look after their money!
This is government theft of the hard working savers in society in order to to pay for a bloated state.
As inflation takes hold and rises significanlty higher than the world's bank rates rise; it will cost hard working savers more and more in government theft.
In a world of no yield or negative yield on cash, then Faber see's gold as being a great buy. Makes sense to me.
I am parking my savings in the stockmarket and commodities ;-)