What do others think? Is this acceptable?
I certainly wouldn't be impressed (and neither, I suspect, would the SEAI be) with that sort of carry-on.
Mine, also a second assessment and also for the PV solar grant, took well over an hour and the assessor was very thorough and took loads of photos and measurements for the BER data input process, as well as going through all of the documentation from the previous BER. (It cost me €300.)
I suspect that your chap assumed that you just wanted him to do a cursory, box ticking BER so you'd get the grant, so he didn't bother to carry out a proper assessment. I certainly wouldn't be happy with that kind of carry-on.
There are other threads on this one already, but while the BER is far from perfect. it would be far worse if a comprehensive study was required like you suggest. Like who's going to spend €5+ on before and after assessments to qualify for the €2k grant???Surely they should be doing an actual scientific heat escape measurement.
The guy who did mine took a number of calculations and measurements - the result is based on things like, what size your walls and windows are, what they are made of, when they were installed, roughly. Any BER from photos only would be only a very very rough estimate and not useful if you want to go forward and do other works based on it. And if you are selling it would be unfair to the buyer.Need an updated BER for a solar panel grant. Agreed a price of €300 with an assessor and agreed that Id allow him till Friday this week to find someone else needing a BER in my area so he could do two jobs at once. That was last Wednesday and now today I get a text saying (unknown to me) that he was here yesterday, took photos and just needs a photo of the fireplace and back of the house to complete it. I was uncontactable yesterday but he just showed up without telling me he was going to.
Just wondering is this normal practice? Im kind of miffed spending €300 for an inspection that doesnt even go inside the house when its all about the fabric of the house. He hasnt seen whats in the attic either and is presumably going off the previous BER done 6 years ago.
What do others think? Is this acceptable?
For example they don't check appliances to see if they work - so you could have what I bought - a house full of broken storage heaters.There are other threads on this one already, but while the BER is far from perfect. it would be far worse if a comprehensive study was required like you suggest. Like who's going to spend €5+ on before and after assessments to qualify for the €2k grant???
The purpose of the BER is to arrive at a ballpark, and to do so inexpensively. The system was never designed, and never purported to be scientifically accurate. It aims to be a good indicator and if the assessment is carried out correctly, it serves that purpose.
We all know this from day one. My assessor didn’t get into one flat and I told him just do it the same as the flat below.Just shows you that the ber rating is complete rubbish and a box ticking exercise. Surely they should be doing an actual scientific heat escape measurement. Its crazy that so much credence is given to this rubbish rating
Well that would make sense as if they had not been modified the BER would be identical - flats are generally more limited in what changes you can make anyway.We all know this from day one. My assessor didn’t get into one flat and I told him just do it the same as the flat below.
So you are happy to have someone charge you a fee, without doing the job that you are paying them to do?I would have no issue with this....
You must be joking, knowing this country, it'll be replaced by something more expensive, and more rediculous - but it'll printed on recycled toilet paper, and delivered by one of only three cyclists using the S2S route :-(I hear you. Look the more customers and BER agents devalue the BER (or expose it) the quicker it will be done away with
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?