M
Actually, that's not what I'm saying. In a devils advocate kind-of way, I'm challenging that traditional Irish 'property as a pension' story. I'm not saying that pension funds are generally better, but I am suggesting that there is no evidence that (as many posters here assume) pension funds are generally worse.However in this thread I fail to understand your reasoning that pension funds (in essence the same as equity funds but with different Taxation rules) are in the main better than other Investment products.
Huh?Well isn't a return of 1% worse than negative equity?
Nothing worse? How about finding that your tenant has done a runner with your couch and your table, and left you cleaning their dog faeces from your sitting room? Or worse still, how about finding that your tenant has NOT done a runner, but is squatting in the house, not paying rent, keeping their dogs in the sitting room, and ignoring all your contacts. Just look around AAM to find the nightmare scenarios from landlords in negative equity dealing with problem tenants.Maybe, but there is nothing worse in knowing after the event that some crowd are pulling heaps of Management fees from a fund for doing nothing, whether the value goes up or down.
You're not comparing like with like, as Howitzer has pointed out. A 1% return on a pension over a lifetime is unknown. You are just as likely (or unlikely) to be able to wait your way out of a bad pension return as a bad property return.But in general you can wait your way out of negative equity, if you end up aged 65 with a pension return of 1% you can do nothing.
Agreed. People need to run the numbers to work out what is best for them. THere is no-one solution.Just because pensions get a lot of tax breaks does not automatically mean that they are worthwhile. A lot of people make a mistake on that.
It's going to cost you 100k out of your pocket to fund this property for the next 22 years and get a return. Based onHi ,
I have a second property as an investment. It's on a 22 year interest only with Haven which is on the Euribor rate which is alot higher than the standard variable rates. The rent I'm recieving is only 1100 a month, a shortfall of over 220 euro a month of which I am subsidising. The property is now only worth around the same as the loan which is 300K. Do I try to get an annuity mortgage over a longer term to try and start paying off this loan and will the banks entertain me?. I'm very conscious of not being able to afford a property on an interest only loan when the rates are as low now as they wll ever be!
Any suggestions would be kindly appreciated
Wino
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?