Average current account fees €90 per year

[Brendan Burgess]

This Indo headline is very misleading.

Now the bank hits you for €260 in fees

Here is what it says way down in the article:

Next year the full force of the new fees regime will mean the average current account holder will end up shelling out about €90 in fees, and another €41 in charges for the likes of non-authorised overdrafts and bounced cheques.

So the headline figure of €260 is twice €90 + €41.

The research was financed by ptsb. Do they not charge for unauthorised overdrafts or bounced cheques?

Anyone who switched to a ptsb current account for free banking some years ago and ended up on a ptsb SVR mortgage as a result, has paid a cumulative of 2% extra on their mortgage, or around, €4,000 on a mortgage of €200,000. At one stage, they were charging an SVR of 6% when AIB and BoI were charging 3%.

And what about people paying huge commissions to investment advisors and ongoing costs to fund managers? These are the costs people should be focussing on. Which is why I turn down invitations to discuss bank fees on radio or television programmes. They are insignificant in the overall context.

Current account banking is an expensive business for banks and they should charge for it.

"Mind the pennies and the pounds will look after themseves" must be the most expensively misleading old saying. Worry about the big costs such as your mortgage rate. Don't be afraid to pay less than €2 a week to get all the benefits of online banking, access to ATMs and occasional cheques.

 

[Brendan Burgess]

Just checked my own charges from AIB for a reasonably active account. I do most of it online and use as few cheques as possible.

For the last year, my total charges, excluding interest, were

bank charges|€73.80
facility fee|€25
Total|€99

I paid stamp duty of €6.00 as well. Not sure what that was for? A debit card and some cheques?

I have just been approved for an increased overdraft for a few months to pay my preliminary tax and they will charge me €25 for that increased facility. But that seems like a reasonable charge for the couple of phone calls and the issue of a letter.

Of course, AIB will also charge me interest when I use the overdraft and will get the benefit of free cash when I have money sitting there.

 

[Bronte]

€90 in fees sounds reasonable, the €41 charge for overdrafts and bounced cheques are not necessary and therefore shouldn't be included in the yearly fee. They are ancillary costs.

 

[theresa1]

http://compare.consumerhelp.ie/CurrentAccountCompare.aspx?i=165,414,


Brendan check this comparison out.

 

[Brendan Burgess]

Thanks Theresa

It confirms that ptsb does charge for referred items and unauthorised overdrafts. More or less the same as AIB.

I don't think it adds much more or takes from my argument that people should not worry too much about current account charges?

 

[twofor1]

Particularly with contactless payments becoming more common, I think many will be paying a lot more than €90 annually in fees. Currently I think most are not charging for contactless payments but will start to charge next year sometime.

We as a couple with a joint current account average 15 transactions weekly. With contactless payments becoming more common I would guess our average could easily go up to 25 weekly, if we were paying 25 transaction charges weekly with BOI the annual cost would be €260 plus €20 annual maintenance fee.


Anyone that has has savings might consider diverting some to their current account to avoid charges.

Many of the main banks as stated in the article have deals if you keep a minimum balance in your current account.

BOI for example, if you keep a balance of €3K, you pay no transaction charges, you just pay the €5 quarterly maintenance fee.

If you had €4K in Rabo @ 2% you would earn €80 annually, take off the DIRT and you are left with €47.20.

If you put that €4K in your current account and considered it a nil balance, you would then have unlimited transactions and an overdraft of €1K for €67.20 annually. (The €47.20 you would lose in interest plus €20 annual maintenance fee)

The only downside is if you are not disciplined, forget it, but if you are there is good savings to be made.

 

[Jim2007]

Bank Charges in Switzerland

As a comparison here is what I pay for a standard account in Switzerland at the Post bank:

Monthly Management Fee| 5.00
Debit Card| Free
Monthly Statement per mail | Free
Payment Orders (SEPA) | Free
Standing Orders | Free
Cash Withdrawal at own ATMs | Free
Cash Withdrawal at other ATMS | 2.00
Cash Withdrawal abroad excluding 3rd Party fees | 5.00
Annual Total| CHF 70 - 100

If you have an average daily balance of 7.5K, a mortgage or a life insurance with them then, you get free banking including cash withdrawals abroad (excluding 3rd party fees)

 

[manninp2]

If you use a credit card for your purchases and clear it by the end of the month you'll only have one transaction charge of €0.20 per month

It is off-putting to use your debit card to pay for something like a cup of coffee for €1.80 and pay €0.20 in a transaction charge!

 

[ronaldo]

I have a Halifax account in Northern Ireland and a Danske account in the Republic.

Everyone here knows Danske's fees but Halifax charge absolutely no fees unless, of course, I go into my overdraft - and they actually pay me a fiver a month for lodging my salary. The joys of competition.

All things considered, Halifax are paying my Danske fees

 

[Lightning]

I have never paid current account fees in my life. No need to.

If you use a credit card for your purchases and clear it by the end of the month you'll only have one transaction charge of €0.20 per month

Or open a PTSB account and pay zippo.

Current account banking is an expensive business for banks and they should charge for it.

Hi Brendan,

I think one needs to look at this from several respects.

1. Interest on current accounts.
Banks earn interest on lending out the cash in current accounts, which nets to a large portion of the banks deposits, and then paying zero percent to customers. Banks should pay customers interest on balances in their current accounts.

2. Automated transactions.
Banking is becoming more and more automated. Branches are closing across the globe at a fast rate. More and more banking is going online. Banks are saving a fortune due to this. The vast majority of online transactions are STP with no human intervention. The cost to the bank is very low for these transactions. It is understandable for the customer to be charged little or nothing for these transactions.

3. Manual transactions.
Manual old fashioned in-branch transactions are expensive for the bank from a staff cost perspective. It is understandable that the bank will charge for these transactions.

4. FX Margin Fees.
Bank are increasingly recouping the cost of free banking via large FX margins on non EUR transactions. Information on these margins is often hidden, unclear or opaque. Banks need to be more transparent with their FX fees and source and timing and margin of FX rates.

In a nutshell, pay me a fair rate for money in my current account, charge me little or nothing for automatic transactions, be fair with FX fees and I will happily pay for manual transactions.

 

[Brendan Burgess]

I
1. Interest on current accounts.
Banks earn interest on lending out the cash in current accounts, which nets to a large portion of the banks deposits, and then paying zero percent to customers. Banks should pay customers interest on balances in their current accounts.

As I said in my opening post "Of course, AIB will also charge me interest when I use the overdraft and will get the benefit of free cash when I have money sitting there. "

But I have a 7 day online account now with AIB and I earn interest on that.

2. Automated transactions.
The cost to the bank is very low for these transactions. It is understandable for the customer to be charged little or nothing for these transactions.

Are they really that cheap? Surely the infrastructure must be very expensive.

3. Manual transactions.
Manual old fashioned in-branch transactions are expensive for the bank from a staff cost perspective. It is understandable that the bank will charge for these transactions.

I think that they should charge for all transactions according to their costs i.e. charge a lot more for cheques than for automated transactions.

4. FX Margin Fees.
Bank are increasingly recouping the cost of free banking via large FX margins on non EUR transactions.

This is what annoys me most. Banks should charge according to the cost of the service. FX margins should not subsidise free banking. ptsb SVR mortgage holders subsidised free banking at a huge cost to themselves.

 

[Brendan Burgess]

I got a cheque today and went down to my local AIB branch to lodge it. It's so long since I lodged a cheque, that I couldn't find the quick lodge machine.

I couldn't figure out the new machine they had either, and I couldn't find a staff member to explain it. ( I kept pressing buttons on the screen but it went too quick for me. It was actually a video demo of the new machine but I had not twigged that)

A guy at the machine beside it had a special "lodgement card" so I assumed that I would have to have one of those.

Then a staff member appeared and told me I could use by own Visa Debit Card.

It turned out to be a good machine after my initial annoyance. I can put a message on my bank statement telling me what the lodgement was for.

That must have been an expensive machine to install, but I suppose it gets me to do all the work that used to be done by the staff.

Brendan

 

[Lightning]

I think that they should charge for all transactions according to their costs i.e. charge a lot more for cheques than for automated transactions.

Agreed. Banks charge per transaction type should be a reasonable margin above cost.

Are they really that cheap? Surely the infrastructure must be very expensive.

The marginal transaction cost per electronic transaction is pretty close to zero to send the data packet. It is going to get even cheaper, in the future, especially with full SEPA implementation.

Infrastructure costs should be recouped via periodic maintenance fees.

 

[ronaldo]

And what about people paying huge commissions to investment advisors and ongoing costs to fund managers? These are the costs people should be focussing on.

I definitely agree with this one. If someone focuses all their attention on getting fee free banking, because the fees are so visible in their bank statements, whilst someone else focuses on reducing the charges within their pension a little whilst ignoring banking fees, the bank fees paid by the second person are going to be comparable to a wart on the backside of an elephant come retirement.

Of course, having focused on the other charges, there's no harm then starting to focus on reducing, or eliminating, bank fees.

 

[Jim2007]

1. Interest on current accounts.
Banks earn interest on lending out the cash in current accounts, which nets to a large portion of the banks deposits, and then paying zero percent to customers. Banks should pay customers interest on balances in their current accounts.

Nice theory, but not the case! Money on current accounts is extremely short term and consequently it is very difficult to lend out, so the best a bank can hope for is placing about 40% of the balances on the over night market. Add in the costs of operation and is very rarely a winner.

2. Automated transactions.
Banking is becoming more and more automated. Branches are closing across the globe at a fast rate. More and more banking is going online. Banks are saving a fortune due to this.

Costs are actually rising - you replace cheap input clerks with software engineers, risk managers etc... add to that all the costs relating to security, the number of redundant data centers required and so on and you will quickly realise that costs are are not in decline. As an example at one Swiss bank where I worked, I had two offices, one I worked at and the second was a fall back in case anything happened (main scenario was terrorists crashing an oil tanker into one of the buildings!) and I needed to relocate in a hurry. In addition we had 3 independent networks connecting each building each differently routed in case one went down. All of this was not by choice, it was an ECB and US Fed requirement.

And of course the IT out sourcing has gone pear shaped as well because they been unable to really move the stuff off shore. So the dream of cheap Indians working in Bangalore has turned into a nightmare of expensive Indians working in Frankfurt, Zurich and London just to mention a few...

4. FX Margin Fees.
Bank are increasingly recouping the cost of free banking via large FX margins on non EUR transactions. Information on these margins is often hidden, unclear or opaque. Banks need to be more transparent with their FX fees and source and timing and margin of FX rates.

FX used to be a good business, but that is long gone too! In fact most large corporate transactions are rarely routed through a bank these days. And those that are on very tight margins.

Asset Management, wealth management and prop desks used to be the real cash cows for the banks... but these days the prop desks are almost outlawed and all clients want to do is buy ETFs! We've gone from measuring performance in percentages to base points...

Any bank that is offering you free banking today has got to make it up some way or they will not be in business in the long run.

 

[murphaph]

Hmmm, I'm with dkb.de which is an online only bank that is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bayrische Landesbank, the state bank of Bavaria. My deposits are therefore guaranteed without limit. I pay absolutely no fees but of course have an almost non existant branch network. Cheques went out of fashion in Germany years ago though so I can't think of a reason a non business customer who isn't lodging cash would actually need to visit a branch. I get superb email support in record time or I can call them if I feel so inclined. I receive interest on my current account balance and can withdraw cash worldwide at any ATM for free.

 

[Brendan Burgess]

Jim

That is a really interesting analysis.

The balance on my current account fluctuates between maybe €20k and -20k. When it's -€20k they are getting around 10% interest on it. Is that profitable? I know that they can't lend my money long-term, but surely they can lend it to others who borrow short-term?

I presume that Ciarán was referring to Forex for individuals? I know it's small scale, but the figures are big.

Can banks not make money at all on their personal banking? You are making feel sorry for them.

 

[so-crates]

And of course the IT out sourcing has gone pear shaped as well because they been unable to really move the stuff off shore. So the dream of cheap Indians working in Bangalore has turned into a nightmare of expensive Indians working in Frankfurt, Zurich and London just to mention a few...

Possibly the quote of the year! The idea that out-sourcing is cheap is really based on the premise of paying people less purely on the basis that they are in another country where current wage rates are a fraction of yours. It is short-term thinking at its worst.

 

[Jim2007]

The balance on my current account fluctuates between maybe €20k and -20k. When it's -€20k they are getting around 10% interest on it. Is that profitable? I know that they can't lend my money long-term, but surely they can lend it to others who borrow short-term?

Your €20k balance is a good example, on a good morning there is 20k on your account that they could lend out, however by lunch time it could be say €10k over drawn, so now they are actually down 50k and of course they will have to borrow from the central bank or over night market to maintain the required liquidity ratios. It is hard to make any kind of serious money in a game where you can't plan. That is why many European banks do not give overdrafts.

Can banks not make money at all on their personal banking? You are making feel sorry for them.

By personal banking, I assume you mean retail banking, right? For banks like BD, SSG, HSBC, CS and UBS, it was well known that retail banking was a loss leader, however it acted as a feeder to get clients on board for wealth management type services. However most clients only want to buy ETFs these days and it is hard to charge much for selling him an ETF!

Like I said we have gone from measuring performance in percent to base points!

 

[murphaph]

Perhaps banks will just have to be satisfied with not making serious money. Banking is after all just an intermediary type business like estate agency, something the internet has also eaten into. Even lending is changing these days with peer to peer lending becoming a reality. Banks will have to keep up or die.