Just note that the ethanol option for the S-max and the V50 result in a 50% VRT reduction, so has quite an effect on the price
Also be aware that there are very few E85 pumps in the state. I have an S40 Flexi-fuel but I've only got E85 into it once, due to lack of proximity of a pump on any regular routes that I take
* VW Touran:
5+2 seats, Energy B, 180 Gram (CO2) per KM, Gas option.
Cons: The 2 optional seats at the back dont fold totally flat (to make a larger boot) like their competitors do.
Pros: Energy level, husband likes it.
* Ford S-Max
5+2 seats, Energy E, 224 Gram (CO2) per KM, Ethanol option.
Cons: A little bit more expensive
Pros: By chosing the ethanol option (available in March) the CO2 number reduces to approximately 50. Excellent boot room for buggys, snowboards and mountain bikes.
* Opel Zafira:
5+2 seats, Energy A, 138 Gram (CO2) per KM, Gas option.
Con: The energy level is excellent but Opel Zafiria are quoting energy level for the gas option where as all other quotes are for the diesel options. By that I mean the 138 is a little bit deceptive in that the other cars will have similiar quotes (like the S-max) when they have the gas/ethanol option on the market.
* Volvo V50:
5 seats, Energy E, 220 Gram (CO2) per KM, Ethanol option.
Very different to the other cars in style.
Am I missing something but why pick MPV or estate for two people?
4 very different vehicles.
Touran and Zafira are most similar. Medium sized MPV's. Not room when all the seats are used. Not great to drive either.
Am I missing something but why pick MPV or estate for two people?
Very interesting, thanks so much, any particular reason why they arent great to drive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?