I am weighing up a couple of options regarding making additional voluntary contributions.
Option 1 is to go with my workplace provider who will offer a certain level of advice, automatic deduction from payroll, and a "safety in numbers" feeling of taking the same approach as almost everyone else regarding AVCs - allocation 98% and AMC 1%.
Option 2 is to go with an execution-only service provider, who will obviously offer no advice and I will have to apply for the tax relief myself and set up a standing order to make the payment - allocation 100% and AMC 1%. I have been in touch with one of these providers who has been very helpful and responsive in answering my practical questions on how to set this up.
I have a good idea of what I want the funds to be invested in, and I think it's pretty straightforward - one of the relatively high-risk Zurich actively managed multi-asset or equity funds, such as Prisma 4/5/6, Performance or Dividend Growth. I am conservative by nature but recognise that this is a long-term investment (I am 37) so I can accept volatility in the short-term. I'll be able to figure out how to claim the tax relief on My Revenue.
I suppose I'm doubting myself a bit that I'm sophisticated enough to go execution-only. What happens, for instance, if I want to change funds in 15 years' time and the execution-only service provider has retired, or if I'm nearing retirement and I need someone to hold my hand through the next steps. And I assume that if I go with Option 2, no one is going to be giving me a nudge at an appropriate time to tell me it's timely that I move into something more low-risk like cash and bonds, I'll just have to decide when to do that myself.
Has anyone any positive or negative experiences of having gone down the execution-only route? And do you get a sense from this post that I know what I'm talking about, or would I be safer sticking to the workplace provider?! Thanks for reading.
Option 1 is to go with my workplace provider who will offer a certain level of advice, automatic deduction from payroll, and a "safety in numbers" feeling of taking the same approach as almost everyone else regarding AVCs - allocation 98% and AMC 1%.
Option 2 is to go with an execution-only service provider, who will obviously offer no advice and I will have to apply for the tax relief myself and set up a standing order to make the payment - allocation 100% and AMC 1%. I have been in touch with one of these providers who has been very helpful and responsive in answering my practical questions on how to set this up.
I have a good idea of what I want the funds to be invested in, and I think it's pretty straightforward - one of the relatively high-risk Zurich actively managed multi-asset or equity funds, such as Prisma 4/5/6, Performance or Dividend Growth. I am conservative by nature but recognise that this is a long-term investment (I am 37) so I can accept volatility in the short-term. I'll be able to figure out how to claim the tax relief on My Revenue.
I suppose I'm doubting myself a bit that I'm sophisticated enough to go execution-only. What happens, for instance, if I want to change funds in 15 years' time and the execution-only service provider has retired, or if I'm nearing retirement and I need someone to hold my hand through the next steps. And I assume that if I go with Option 2, no one is going to be giving me a nudge at an appropriate time to tell me it's timely that I move into something more low-risk like cash and bonds, I'll just have to decide when to do that myself.
Has anyone any positive or negative experiences of having gone down the execution-only route? And do you get a sense from this post that I know what I'm talking about, or would I be safer sticking to the workplace provider?! Thanks for reading.