Squirrelstown
Registered User
- Messages
- 31
response from AIB to Oireachtas finance committee re simple interest ...
AIB has in good faith implemented the legally binding directive of the FSPO in compensation for what was deemed the contractual breach of the customer not having a tracker option available at the end of their fixed rate. The FSPO has confirmed that the approach the bank took in that complaint case is fully in accordance with his decision.
The FSPO direction required AIB to:
• Calculate the interest the customer actually paid on the account from the point of impact
• Calculate the interest the customer would have been charged on the reduced capital balance from 30 April 2010, after a write down of 12% of the capital balance has been effected
• Subtract the amount of interest that would have been paid by the Complainant on the written down balance from the amount of interest that was actually paid by the Complainant and refund the difference.
Step 1. AIB calculated the total amount of interest charged by the bank (and paid by the customer) during the period on this account.
Step 2. AIB then calculated how much the customer would have been charged in interest on the reduced portion of the loan.
This was calculated based on the payments actually made by the customer over the relevant period. The interest that would have been charged on the 12% (at date of write down) portion of the loan balance is deducted from customer payments; this determines the amount of interest that would have been charged on the reduced (written down) capital balance.
• The calculated refund is the difference between the figures in the two steps above. This refunds the interest charged on the 12% portion of the mortgage which was the intent of the FSPO decision.
AIB has in good faith implemented the legally binding directive of the FSPO in compensation for what was deemed the contractual breach of the customer not having a tracker option available at the end of their fixed rate. The FSPO has confirmed that the approach the bank took in that complaint case is fully in accordance with his decision.
The FSPO direction required AIB to:
• Calculate the interest the customer actually paid on the account from the point of impact
• Calculate the interest the customer would have been charged on the reduced capital balance from 30 April 2010, after a write down of 12% of the capital balance has been effected
• Subtract the amount of interest that would have been paid by the Complainant on the written down balance from the amount of interest that was actually paid by the Complainant and refund the difference.
Step 1. AIB calculated the total amount of interest charged by the bank (and paid by the customer) during the period on this account.
Step 2. AIB then calculated how much the customer would have been charged in interest on the reduced portion of the loan.
This was calculated based on the payments actually made by the customer over the relevant period. The interest that would have been charged on the 12% (at date of write down) portion of the loan balance is deducted from customer payments; this determines the amount of interest that would have been charged on the reduced (written down) capital balance.
• The calculated refund is the difference between the figures in the two steps above. This refunds the interest charged on the 12% portion of the mortgage which was the intent of the FSPO decision.