Under the Consumer Prothection Code, the bank is obliged to act in your best interests. Assuming that the rate on the loan is higher than the rate on the deposit, they should have advised you to use the deposit to pay off the loan from the start.
So, first, you should insist that they refund you any excess interest. For example, if money was on deposit at 2% for 10 months but they were charging you 3% on the loan, then they should refund you €30,000 @1% = €300 per year = €250 for 10 months.
Have they set the €30,000 off agains the loan yet? If not, then don't agree to it for the moment. This is going to happen this week
Is there any formal legal connection between the loan and the property you sold? none what so ever. It seems to me that you secured the loan on the 1 acre site. Yes this correct. If so, the bank has no right to the €30,000 and they should not have pressurised you into giving them a lien over it. I would insist on withdrawing the €30,000 cash and putting it in an account at a separate bank. Tried this and they siad I can't You can use the cash to keep up the repayments on the loan.
When your financial position is more secure, you can decide whether the best thing to do is to use what is left of the capital to repay the loan.
Write to the bank and tell them that they have no right to the deposit. Under the Consumer Protection Code they should have advised you what was in your best intersts. They did not do so. Tell them that you want to withdraw the money immediately. Tell them that if they do not comply, you will make a formal complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman
It's very important that you check your credit record with the ICB. If they have put up the missed payments, then tell them to correct this.
Brendan
The bank gave gave me the 100k never asked for proof of income just the site as security and there was never any planning got on this site.
The bank called me in and said the borrowing was very high against the site and asked me for more security
In your original post;
"They said the only way they would do this is if they got title deeds from land that my mother has,"... was the loan secured on land that belonged to your mother, or is this a different site?
Is there anything in your contract that allows AIB to demand more security? The value of the site is very low compared to your debt secured on it, but that's the bank's problem, they shouldn't have lent your the money without adequate security in the first place!
I am not sure how widespread such practice by banks is, but it's really appalling.
I think Brendan is right, you should stand up to the bank and fight to get the 30,000 back, you wouldn't have had any immediate financial problems if you hadn't given this money to the bank, as you could have used it to subsidise loan payments for a very long time or paid some off the loan and retained the remainder. It's not up to the bank to decide what you should do with your money, just because they were stupid to lend without sufficient security.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?