MonsieurBond
Registered User
- Messages
- 819
Isn't that all a bit convoluted? Why not just say it's transaction fee free banking or not rather than having to follow a flowchart to figure out whether or not you qualify?zat29 said:Very welcome news to me. The thoughts of changing bank to avail of free transactions was way too much hassle judging by many of the posts here about switcher accounts...
From the AIB [broken link removed]....
Qualifying criteria details
- have an AIB Current Account
- be registered for AIB Phone & Internet Banking
- have an AIB Debit Card
then every fee quarter:-
1. Use your AIB Debit Card to make a purchase transaction at a point of sale terminal, by telephone, mail order or Internet.
2. Make a debit transaction using AIB Phone & Internet Banking (e.g. pay a bill, top up a mobile, transfer money between accounts, transfer money to other branches and banks, make an international payment).
Where the customer meets the qualifying criteria, free transaction banking is automatic and no maintenance and transactions fees will be applied for that fee quarter.
Customers will not need to opt in for this offer. Service fees will still apply e.g. unpaids, duplicate statements and FX bureau transactions.
All those AIB customers who were struck by inertia
MugsGame said:I can't understand the focus by IFSRA and others on bank charges, when there are far more significant issues facing the banking industry -- e.g. misselling of payment protection insurance and poor value investment products pushed by tied agents more interested in their commission than customer needs.
elcato said:Bear in mind that AIB only produced charges , in my opinion, after realising that their SSIA fixed rate account was offering 4% interest.
elcato said:Strange that when the accounts start maturing that they change back again. So don't be fooled into thinking that its competition that was the motivation for this.
None - but I never said/insinuated that most or all AIB customers who didn't switch were struck by inertia. I simply said that those that were could have saved money before now.MugsGame said:What evidence do you have for your belief that AIB customers who did not switch were struck by inertia?
Who mentioned laziness? Or that bank charges might not be justified or a relatively minor cost/concern in the greater scheme of things?CCOVICH said:I wasn't struck by inertia. I have never received any bother with AIB (I'm sure many have) and was actually reasonably happy to pay for what I considered good service. Hence I kepy my account there based on my experiences, not laziness. I didn't spend much (if any) time beomaning the fact that I payed charges.
It would work better/faster if people for whom bank charges were an issue switched sooner to institutions that did not charge them thus forcing the hands of other instutitons who persisted in levying them. Competition is also driven by the consumer but some consumers act passively as if competition just "happens", eventually and by default.CCOVICH said:Increased competition certainly appears to be working for the consumer.
CCOVICH said:I honestly don't have any recollection of this as I was a BoI customer at that time. But I thought that current account charges were around before that time.
Sorry, but when I see the moves made by ptsb, UB, BoSI, and BoI, I have to say that the AIB move looks like a response to those offerings. But that really doesn't bother me-it's free banking for me, and as long as the level of service I have experienced in the past doesn't decline, I won't second guess the motives too much.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?