AIB and KBC to write off all debts in cases of voluntary surrender

Brendan Burgess

Founder
Messages
54,834
OK, the Irish Times has a full story on it here

Debt free in three months with new bankruptcy option




I have argued this from the start

A Personal Insolvency Arrangement does not have to be for 6 years!

Jim Stafford refers to "lump sum PIAs" in that thread, claiming that these constitute the majority of PIAs.
 
At last common sense, a version of our IVA lump sum payment. if you have a load of unsecured debt and someone with a few quid to offer in full and final settlement, then that is the way to go.

I will certainly recommend those coming to me with the ability to do this talk to a respected PIP about the option.

I guess the problem is as always, "how much money, or what percentage of the liability will get the deal done". No detail on this.

Steve Thatcher
[broken link removed]
 
Do you need a lump sum payment to avail of the fast-track insolvency deals? Thank you.
 

Can't see any mention of a lump sum being required. In the earlier article that Brendan linked to there was a mention of a small €100 lump sum by a PIP who got 3 of them across the line.
 
This is a great development.
Hopefully other lenders will follow the lead but I can see BOI being reluctant considering Mr Bouchers recent comments about vetos.

There is a distinct need to purge the system of bad debt that will probably never be repaid. The sooner this can be done for genuine cases the better.

It still remains to be seen if the OA will allow any early discharges from bankruptcy once its clear there's no money or assets left. I have heard talk of a Personal Insolvency Roadshow so maybe by the time thats get going they will have some more favourable options to entice people in.
 
pat2 said:
Can't see any mention of a lump sum being required. In the earlier article that Brendan linked to there was a mention of a small €100 lump sum by a PIP who got 3 of them across the line.
Click to expand...


It also mentions lumps sums and contributions from family.

This will obviously play out and it will be interesting to see how it develops. But finally we may be getting to a place where underwater property can be handed back and if there is no chance of a contribution, a write off ensues.

I have to say tho that I am still getting loads of people saying they are being told no write off under any circumstances. So these two situations appear at odds.

Steve Thatcher
 
Steve Thatcher said:
I have to say tho that I am still getting loads of people saying they are being told no write off under any circumstances.
Click to expand...

That seems to be the default response from the banks but it was highly unlikely there was ever going to be widespread write downs while people hold onto properties and refuse to enter some insolvency mechanism.
Even BOI will have to write off mortgage debt when people go through bankruptcy so what they are saying is not true.
 
Sorry for the confusion.

I saw the story first on the Indo and linked to that.

But the Irish Times had more detail about the actual scheme developed by the IMHO.

I have lobbied the banks for some time to produce a protocol for voluntary surrender, but fair play to David Hall for managing to persuade the two banks to agree to it.



Brendan
 
...probably afraid of a wave of borrowers throwing the keys at them.

There is a substantial body of people who can't service their mortgage and the loss needs to be crystallised, whether the banks want to cover their eyes and ears or not. I would think they should be welcoming the prospect of reclaiming some properties and selling them (it is currently a very good time to sell property in Dublin), without having to resort to the marathon repossession process.

If borrowers have woken up to the fact that they will lose their properties then banks need to wake up to the fact the debts are not going to be paid.
 
I read the article too yesterday on the Irish Independent.
Very surprised at the speed of the process.
 

Surely that would depend on whether the borrower can come close to making the repayments? Charlie's article is a bit bare bones. The examiner article has a bit more detail and explains that it could result in various outcomes for various people. Obviously some combinations are no doubt possible.

http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/borrowers-to-write-off-loans-after-3-months-271001.html

1. Surrender of their own home
2. Surrender of their BTL property
3. An agreement that sees the borrower retain their home (lump sum)

The fact is, there is a substantial rump of borrowers who cannot afford the repayments on their mortgage(s) under any reasonably foreseeable circumstance and the ownership of these properties (both BTL and PDH) will have to change hands at some point. Even if you believe this is a small % of the overall arrears figure it is still a substantial number because our overall arrears are so preposterously high. We've been denying that reality for 6-7 years now and at some point it has to be faced.
 
It doesn't seem to me that anything formal has been agreed. No borrower will be able to march into AIB and claim that they qualify for some deal.

The following would make sense for the lenders

A completely unsustainable home loan in big negative equity
In exchange for an agreed sale, the lender to use their unsecured debt to force through a PIA or DSA on the credit unions and other unsecured debts.

A sustainable mortgage if restructured
For example a €400k mortgage on a €200k house with €50k other unsecured debts. Borrower could afford a €300k mortgage.

Treat €100k as unsecured and force an accelerate DSA on the other unsecured debts.

Bank likely to recover €300k rather than less than €200k in a bankruptcy or court repossession.

A sustainable home loan if buy to let and unsecured creditors sorted
Agreed sale of buy to let and force a write off on unsecured creditors in an accelerated DSA.
 
Its clear to me that the IMHO is using the media to suck in the punters with sensationalist headlines.

I wasn't at all surprised that KBC came out yesterday to deny outright IMHOs claims that some sort of deal had been reached on short PIAs

I think anyone dealing with the banks on a daily basis will know that the banks are not encouraging PIAs. Probably especially true in the case of KBC

The only reason the IMHO is releasing this type of headline to the press is to get the punters through the door.
 
Yesterday's reporting of the AIB / KBC / IMHO deal and KBC's subsequent denial is emblematic of everything that is wrong with Ireland's response to the mortgage arrears and insolvency crisis - a bleak farce comprising of a series of false dawns. I'm very disappointed in David Hall for yesterday's mess.
 
Dr.Debt said:
Its clear to me that the IMHO is using the media to suck in the punters with sensationalist headlines.

...

The only reason the IMHO is releasing this type of headline to the press is to get the punters through the door.
Click to expand...

I don't agree.

David Hall has negotiated a good information/advisory service for borrowers paid for by AIB and KBC. This has helped to get some people who would not otherwise have engaged, to engage which is for their benefit and the benefit of the lender.

I think he may have overstepped the mark in his enthusiasm on this issue. He may have exaggerated the agreement, but he has not made it up either.
 
Inclined to go with Dr .Debt.

A few things seem obvious, if you accept the following.

1. Banks after 5 years have a good idea of the completely unsustainable mortgages.


Therefore they have poor and very poor choices.
a. Go down the emotive eviction route , that would be fraught with difficulty and costs.
b. Go down a pragmatic consented sale type route , at least they get a clean cost effective closure.
..................................
If customer goes down b.route , customer can at least have an opportunity of getting on with their lives. The customer gets closure on this horror.
...................................................................................
This (initiative) has the smell of IMHO being used to test the market for Banks for this type of solution.

On the face of the little we see , it has merit.
 
Brendan, I would guess that IMHO went to the two banks in question with this proposal and there may have been a couple of nodding or sympathetic ears on the bank side of the table but no more than that. KBC has denied that there is such an agreement in place and that's the current situation. Otherwise I would have to say that I admire the IMHO organisation for what they are trying to do, however building up the hopes of distressed and vulnerable debtors with false hopes is not the way to go.

The plain truth is that all the main banks are simply not willing to write off debt en-masse. At this stage there must be thousands of cases that have approached banks willing to sell properties in exchange for writing off the negative equity shortfall. Sometimes the banks will say "that we wont pursue the debtor for the shortfall if he doesnt have the money" but they are not willing to formalize the write-off in a PIA OR put anything in writing. And that's the stale mate.

And if you take it a step further, the reason the banks are not agreeing to the type of solution that the IMHO is trying to achieve (as per its latest press release) is that the banks simply don't have the resources (balance sheet strength) to absorb the level of debt write off that is needed to solve the mess in overall terms.

Quite frankly, neither the central bank or the government is stepping up to the mark here. The main task facing us as a country is how to recapitalize the banks in such a way that we can then move forward and purge the unsustainable debt. The central bank continues to turn the screws on the banks in terms of resolving the arrears books but the banks are really only playing lip service to this.

The facts remain.As a country We have a huge debt problem. The banks need to be forced to purge the unsustainable debt as quickly as possible. To do this they will need either further capitalization or they will need a bail-in (Cyprus style) where the depositors monies are converted to capital. This has to happen sooner or later. We are just prolonging the agony now and David Halls dream cannot happen until the bigger picture is sorted out first.
 
ah shucks, David Hall's dream can't happen until the bigger picture is sorted!
So either a bail in by the taxpayer or robbing depositors of their hard earned cash....where do I sign up to either options in order to fulfill that dream!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register