We started a renovation of our home in February.
We engaged a planning consultant and a builder that he works closely with, both were recommended by friends. The consultant offers a ‘full service’, which includes the services of a structural engineer and any planning applications.
Plans were drawn up, discussed and agreed. A detailed tender document was prepared we got three quotes and selected the builder our friends recommended. The main focus of the project is the renovation of downstairs and the replacement of all our windows and doors. We are living upstairs during the works.
The project started in February and was due to finish at the end of June.
The main delays we encountered relate to a well known windows company. A two week delay due to ‘technical issues’ a two week delivery delay. Then due to a production mistake, a 4 week delay due to the front door having to be taken back out and aligned properly. The final mastic on the windows is still not done 7 weeks after installation. There has been no inspection of the windows and there are numerous issues with them, faulty locks, damage done to frames on installation, sealant/glue still visible on aluminium frames, holes drilled through them not plugged, etc.
The consultant has been very elusive. He does site visits when payments are due, provides no updates, does not track changes, does not agree anything with us in advance, he told us he has 15 jobs on the go at the same time. As a result, our main point of contact has become the builder. We are happy with the work the builder has done.
The problem with the windows was not picked up by the consultant, we noticed it ourselves, in fact he told the windows company that we were requesting the door be taken back out. We had to step in ourselves to resolve the problem.
Early on in the project a number of load bearing walls downstairs were removed. Shortly after a number of cracks appeared upstairs in several locations. The builder reassured us that he would make good any problems and repair them in full. The structural engineer assess the problem and agreed what remedial works needed to done. The consultant has now instructed the builder to “make good the internal plaster with a plaster skim finish to match the existing & leave ready for future painting / papering”. As a result our master bedroom, ensuite, stairs and landing are left unfinished awaiting wallpapering and painting.
We were told by the consultant that windows would be removed and installed from the outside. At no point was there any conversation about internal damage. There is no allowance in the tender documents for repairs to the inside of our home. The windows were removed and new windows installed from the inside. Extensive damage was done to the walls around the windows, we were told a kango hammer had to be used, we have also noticed damage to wardrobes and hardwood floors. The consultant approved an invoice from the builder which included an amount to “repair the reveals”, this was before it was discussed with us and before the work had been completed. The cost did not include painting/ wallpapering.
Our renovation project is nearing completion, however, every room in our home, now needs to be painted/wallpapered to bring it back to its original state. The electrical plans specified wired smoke and heat detectors. These have not been installed. We are worried that this does not comply with building regulations.
The consultant wants to put the window issues and outstanding mastic work on a ‘snag list’. Even though the builder offered to do the mastic himself and reclaim the money from the windows company.
The consultant is not impartial, he openly said he needed to free up the builder to work on his other jobs. The builder is very dependant on this consultant for his work.
We have been told by the builder that the consultant is planning on doing a snag list.
He has not contacted us about it and we don’t know what this involves. We are also very unclear on how we get from here to the end of our project which is to apply for retention permission.
We want this work completed as soon as possible. But we want assurances that the work has been completed to the required standard and that it meets all building regulations.
We prefer to resolve any issues in a fair and amicable way, but we are unsure on how best to go about this. Any advice would be most welcome.
We engaged a planning consultant and a builder that he works closely with, both were recommended by friends. The consultant offers a ‘full service’, which includes the services of a structural engineer and any planning applications.
Plans were drawn up, discussed and agreed. A detailed tender document was prepared we got three quotes and selected the builder our friends recommended. The main focus of the project is the renovation of downstairs and the replacement of all our windows and doors. We are living upstairs during the works.
The project started in February and was due to finish at the end of June.
The main delays we encountered relate to a well known windows company. A two week delay due to ‘technical issues’ a two week delivery delay. Then due to a production mistake, a 4 week delay due to the front door having to be taken back out and aligned properly. The final mastic on the windows is still not done 7 weeks after installation. There has been no inspection of the windows and there are numerous issues with them, faulty locks, damage done to frames on installation, sealant/glue still visible on aluminium frames, holes drilled through them not plugged, etc.
The consultant has been very elusive. He does site visits when payments are due, provides no updates, does not track changes, does not agree anything with us in advance, he told us he has 15 jobs on the go at the same time. As a result, our main point of contact has become the builder. We are happy with the work the builder has done.
The problem with the windows was not picked up by the consultant, we noticed it ourselves, in fact he told the windows company that we were requesting the door be taken back out. We had to step in ourselves to resolve the problem.
Early on in the project a number of load bearing walls downstairs were removed. Shortly after a number of cracks appeared upstairs in several locations. The builder reassured us that he would make good any problems and repair them in full. The structural engineer assess the problem and agreed what remedial works needed to done. The consultant has now instructed the builder to “make good the internal plaster with a plaster skim finish to match the existing & leave ready for future painting / papering”. As a result our master bedroom, ensuite, stairs and landing are left unfinished awaiting wallpapering and painting.
We were told by the consultant that windows would be removed and installed from the outside. At no point was there any conversation about internal damage. There is no allowance in the tender documents for repairs to the inside of our home. The windows were removed and new windows installed from the inside. Extensive damage was done to the walls around the windows, we were told a kango hammer had to be used, we have also noticed damage to wardrobes and hardwood floors. The consultant approved an invoice from the builder which included an amount to “repair the reveals”, this was before it was discussed with us and before the work had been completed. The cost did not include painting/ wallpapering.
Our renovation project is nearing completion, however, every room in our home, now needs to be painted/wallpapered to bring it back to its original state. The electrical plans specified wired smoke and heat detectors. These have not been installed. We are worried that this does not comply with building regulations.
The consultant wants to put the window issues and outstanding mastic work on a ‘snag list’. Even though the builder offered to do the mastic himself and reclaim the money from the windows company.
The consultant is not impartial, he openly said he needed to free up the builder to work on his other jobs. The builder is very dependant on this consultant for his work.
We have been told by the builder that the consultant is planning on doing a snag list.
He has not contacted us about it and we don’t know what this involves. We are also very unclear on how we get from here to the end of our project which is to apply for retention permission.
We want this work completed as soon as possible. But we want assurances that the work has been completed to the required standard and that it meets all building regulations.
We prefer to resolve any issues in a fair and amicable way, but we are unsure on how best to go about this. Any advice would be most welcome.