A Christmas present for senior Civil Servants

Howitzer

Registered User
Messages
1,458
Does anyone have an opinion on [broken link removed] that came out on Christmas Eve?

I've posted this a couple of times but have struggled to constrain my disgust.


Karl Whelan and Richard Bruton pretty much nail it.
 
Do we have any idea how many public servants are on such "performance related bonuses"?

Have we any idea what metrics are used to evaluate the payments which I understand are anything up to 10% of the base salary?

Are such payments superannuationable?
 
What I am wondering about is that this was supposedly a payment for performance related pay. As shown earlier 13 out of 14 received it. So this new amendment to the cutback is now treating this as part of normal pay and therefore performance was never really part of the payment.

The lower grades should be frothing at the mouth at this slap in the face.
 
Excellent news.
Shows that this Government is for turning.
This surely must be grist to the union's mill , hopefully co-ordinated industrial action will now further influence Government thinking.
 

Excellent news.
Shows that this Government is for turning.
This surely must be grist to the union's mill , hopefully co-ordinated industrial action will now further influence Government thinking.

I don't think you really get who runs this country, and for whose benefit it's so run. You've been shafted.
 
Excellent news.
Shows that this Government is for turning.
This surely must be grist to the union's mill , hopefully co-ordinated industrial action will now further influence Government thinking.

Why exactly is this excellent news?

And once again, how then do you propose that the required savings are made?
 
Be interesting to hear the union view as their own salaries are directly tied to these grades so they've an even greater than usual vested interest. But I presume it'll be no paycuts for anyone in the public service no matter how overpaid.

It should be noted that the Hayes report which took several months to fudge a 100% overpayment to some grades down to a 10-15% paycut did not take bonuses into account when doing its comparisons, i.e. the original pay cut recommended had already taken into account that bonuses were not going to be paid.

I can only hope they have shot themselves in the foot by being spectacularly over greedy, the last thing the higher grades needs after the neatly controlled and edited Hayes report (basically published conclusions without showing the figures or basis for "adjusted income") is people looking closely at their salary levels.
 
The lower grades should be frothing at the mouth at this slap in the face.


We are . Those 'performance related' rewards that Asst Secs got always left a bad taste in people's mouths. They were usually based on a lot of hard work and initiative from those lower down the ranks. Thankfully they've now been scrapped.
 
Well (speaking as a Public Servant) no PS should be getting a bonus anyway. It just doesn't sit right considering what your job is about.

However your view point is not exactly correct. They have incorporated them into normal pay (on the face of it) and therefore eased the pain for themselves and basically let all the rest of the CS/PS suffer but not themselves.
 
I don't think you really get who runs this country, and for whose benefit it's so run. You've been shafted.
I'm in no doubt as to who runs the country.
The most incompetent shower of wasters I've ever had the misfortune to have as the Government of my country !
As to whose benefit it's run for ? - could I propose a coterie of Bankers and developers ?
Your " you've been shafted " comment needs some explanation unless you're referring to what the majority of the country has experienced under this Government !
 
I think you're deluding yourself DB. This isn't the thin edge of any wedge. This is about pensionable salaries. This is about those in senior CS positions pulling up the drawbridge.
 
I think you're deluding yourself DB. This isn't the thin edge of any wedge. This is about pensionable salaries. This is about those in senior CS positions pulling up the drawbridge.
Have to disagree.
This rowback demonstrates clearly that this Government is for turning.
The knock on effect has seen the CPSU up in arms and will ultimately make it easier for all the unions to sell industrial action to their already furious members.
Still at a loss to understand your " you've been shafted " comment !
 
I agree. I think this is going to add fuel to the fire of angry civil servants down the ranks and has made industrial action much more likely now. I presume the logic that senior civil servants will use is that 10% of their salary was 'held back' every year until they proved they had reached certain targets but I don't think this will wash.
 

Liaconn I agree with you on this. However what has to be remembered here is that they have now incorporated what was a "variable" on their salary into their normal pay. Normal civil servants don't have this "soft" option that they used and I think that it is more likely than not that the CPSU will go down the road of industrial action regardless of what ICTU do.

It was a smart move but no matter what excuse they provide they have converted "unguaranteed" pay into "guaranteed" pay. Straw that broke the camels back comes to mind.
 
There was a thread a while back entitled public sector vs public sector - it could happen yet.
 
Do we have any idea how many public servants are on such "performance related bonuses"?
Now 600 escape full brunt of public sector pay cuts.

Who'd a thunk it, that bonuses were so common in the public sector.