Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,807
Despite
· the booming economy
· the artificially high Corporation Tax returns
· the artificially low interest rates
Minister Donohue is budgeting for a budget deficit next year.
We will increase our borrowing next year because we are planning to spend more than we raise in taxation.
Cowen was brought in to loosen the purse strings and spend, spend, spend without a thought for tomorrow because McCreevy wouldn't... and McCreevy put aside billions into the Reserve Fund...
Interesting. But if McCreevy was in charge from 1997 to 2004, during a period of great growth, should he not have reduced spending even more? Of course, was Cowen really to blame? Didn't Noonan call him Scrooge for not spending more. We all partied.
Point of order on the thread title...
Cowen was brought in to loosen the purse strings and spend, spend, spend without a thought for tomorrow because McCreevy wouldn't... and McCreevy put aside billions into the Reserve Fund... I'm not saying McCreevy's budgets were perfect but there's no comparison.
McCreevy was Minister for Finance from 1997 to 2004. Over that time the national debt went down both in real terms (by 1 billion) and in % terms of GDP (by 30%).
I totally agree that the budget was a missed opportunity to reduce spending, increased social welfare in the current economic climate is bonkers.
It's not even good politics for FG.
Was that not the reason McCreevy was banished to Europe, because he would not spend more ?Interesting. But if McCreevy was in charge from 1997 to 2004, during a period of great growth, should he not have reduced spending even more?
Brendan
Yes, it was definitely a populist budget... with the haulmarks of FF all over itThis was essentially a FF budget. There was no way they would pass the kind of budget that is actually needed.
Yes, it was definitely a populist budget... with the haulmarks of FF all over it
Sadly the types of budgets we actually need, we don't have anyone capable of implementing.
Our chance was when the IMF were in, and we blew it
One thing I don't see in the budget is any attempt to address the looming pension crises, by either proper funding of the public service pensions/old age pensions or a strategy to tackle the looming crises in front of us...
aising the state pension is about the one thing that nearly all parties enthusiastically support but also which most people in general support , we are a very sentimental people when it comes to the elderly
I am not disagreeing with you, but all of this is based on the premise that each generation will be better off than the previous one, and creates a form of social contract. The sad reality is this is no longer the case, and appears the quality of living for Generation X, Y & Z will be lower than the Baby Boomers.
I have no objection with increasing the old age pension (in theory), but I would like to see my pension funded from the PRSI paid today. This should be securely placed into a fund that will be used for that purpose - and being honest constitutionally protected. I don't want my kids to pay for my pension - they should pay for their own. Like most countries in the western world we have an aging population with no provision for them. We cannot even manage a budget surplus in the current climate !
I have always struggled to understand why anyone over 65 pays less tax on the same income as someone under it. I would have thought someone under 65 on the same income would in effect be 'poorer' and therefore deserve the same treatment tax wise.
And maybe the Generation X/Y/Z category need to start voting in higher numbers and stay away from the traditional partiespensioners have far less spending demands than the younger generations , their immense political power is entirely behind the universal desire to court their vote
the young are very slow in this country to realise the elderly do not give a hoot about them
And maybe the Generation X/Y/Z category need to start voting in higher numbers and stay away from the traditional parties
I genuinely thought the Social Democrats would have attracted a larger share of the vote the last time around, as it appears to be a better 'idealogy' for younger voters....
We had one, it was called the Troika. Unfortunately we are back to auction politics and everyone looking to their left.We need a sort of "temporary dictatorship" of sorts to come in and make all the unpopular but fiscally prudent decisions we should be making.
There are too many cooks in the kitchen in on this budget and the end result isn't very palatable.
We had one, it was called the Troika. Unfortunately we are back to auction politics and everyone looking to their left.
The problem is the same as it has always been; a mutton-headed and economically illiterate electorate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?