Are you absolutely sure about that. I find it difficult to believe that any unit linked fund would have no annual management fee.No annual management fee.
Yes - annual management fees are calculated on the full value of the fund (albeit normally calculated/deducted daily and reflected in the unit price). As I said I would be very surprised if the Acorn fund(s) did not have an annual management fee.However the 1% annual management fee which you mention - generally does this 1% apply to the full value of the fund - if so, this might prove just as costly if I put my 24k into various other funds...
Are you absolutely sure about that. I find it difficult to believe that any unit linked fund would have no annual management fee.
Acorn Life's Managed and Managed Growth funds are managed by HSBC Asset Management. If there is no annual management fee, how are HSBC being paid?
So the annual management charge is 0.5%. This is in addition to the per contribution charge of 5% and policy fee of €4.50 but is calculated on the full value of the fund and reflected in the daily unit price. So the units are valued and then reduced by 0.5%/365 = 0.0137% to reflect this charge.
Is there any bid/offer spread?
I disagree. It seems clear enough to me once you posted the relevant extract.Thats what I figured after I read the T&C's but thanks for clarifying that for me Clubman. Seems like a sneaky way of including an annual management charge.
Not necessarily. It used to be but there are many funds these days with no bid-offer spread. The spread is yet another effective charge.Yes. There is a bid/offer spread. Is this not typical for most unit linked funds?
I disagree. It seems clear enough to me once you posted the relevant extract.
At least the annual management charge of 0.5% is competitive. The rest of the charges are not in my opinion (unless you can identify tangible benefits accruing from paying these that are not available for lower charges elsewhere). How the various charges affect valuations compared to another fund with no charges other than a c. 1% annual management charge would need some number crunching to figure out. As you mentioned above higher per contribution charges and a lower annual management fee could, in some cases, be less of a drag on performance than no per contribution charges and a higher annual management fee.
That's different - that's the intermediary allegedly misleading you. I was referring to the printed terms & conditions which seem clear enough.maybe. But to tell me twice that there was absolutely no annual charge and no other fees other than the per contribution charge and policy fee, while all along they were reducing the unit value, is a bit sneaky in my opinion.
The charges seem high to me but you'd need to crunch some numbers to compare the impact to another fund with no charges other than a c. 1% annual management charge.ok, so to summarise with Acorn Life I pay 0.5% annual mgt charge, €234 on contribution & policy fees for '08 (which will probably be somewhere between 0.75-1% of fund value depending on performance!!) & a spread charge.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?