Gulliver, do I understand what happened here correctly?
The solicitor drew down the cheque on 11 December 1992 and lodged it to his own account.
Then some weeks or months later, the sale closed and the solicitor made out his own cheque for the purchase price.
So he thought he was borrowing €50,000 for exactly 20 years, but instead when he paid €50,000 for the house, he alread owed €50,500?
If it was an annual rest interest calculation, would it make any difference?
But as you say, the repayments should have been recalculated to reflect this.
Brendan
"The interim interest was correctly charged from the date the loan cheque was cashed on 11 December 1992 to 31 December 1992.
As we cannot know beforehand the exact date on which your solictor will cash the loan cheque (the completition date), the monthly repayments quoted in the Loan Offer letter are not calculated on the sum of the capital borrowed plus the interim interest, just on the capital alone.
The interim interest has the effect of increasing the loan balance, therefore more repayments are required to pay it off. This caused the maturity date of your loan to be extended by 9 months"
They appear to be suggesting interest for this 3 week period 11th – 31st Dec (cheque being cashed and completion) extended the loan by 9 months, definitely not.
You have to consider that interest rates were approx 14% in 1992
Building Societies have some strange practices not shared by the Banks.I would imagine that this would be standard practice across all Financial Institutions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?