As we're all aware, it costs Ireland more than Germany to borrow money as Ireland is perceived as being more risky than Germany. Germany is always trotted out as being the safe bet.
As far as I'm aware (correct me if I'm wrong), Ireland has never defaulted on a debt. Throughout or history we have been the perfect customer, paying all our debts in a timely manner.
However, in recent history (bearing in mind that this money is borrowed over decades), Germany has had a number of actual default or practical defaults. Germany defaulted after WWI. Then Germany had was was essentially a default in the 30s with their rampant inflation, followed by another default at the end of WWII. East Germany essentially defaulted when it ceased to exist in 1989. 4 default episodes in 100 years - yet regarded as the least risky borrower in Europe?
Do the lenders take past history into account at all? You may argue that the above events were "once off", but, when you have 4 x once off events in a short space of time, they can hardly be called once offs anymore?
So, how does a country with a perfect payment record and a past history of doing whatever it can, even to the detriment of its citizens, to pay the debts be regarded as a bigger risk that a regular defaulter?
As far as I'm aware (correct me if I'm wrong), Ireland has never defaulted on a debt. Throughout or history we have been the perfect customer, paying all our debts in a timely manner.
However, in recent history (bearing in mind that this money is borrowed over decades), Germany has had a number of actual default or practical defaults. Germany defaulted after WWI. Then Germany had was was essentially a default in the 30s with their rampant inflation, followed by another default at the end of WWII. East Germany essentially defaulted when it ceased to exist in 1989. 4 default episodes in 100 years - yet regarded as the least risky borrower in Europe?
Do the lenders take past history into account at all? You may argue that the above events were "once off", but, when you have 4 x once off events in a short space of time, they can hardly be called once offs anymore?
So, how does a country with a perfect payment record and a past history of doing whatever it can, even to the detriment of its citizens, to pay the debts be regarded as a bigger risk that a regular defaulter?