Search results

A negative yield is a guaranteed loss, the underlying value of the bond allowing for inflation may rise or fall and so does the income you cannot have it both ways, the ecb position on the bonds is loss making and if it continues it will need a bailout as the underlying value of the bond is at...

Ryanair said recently that they have 4 billion cash reserves available I will ask where they keep it for you, if the ecb are not buying provide the aam readers who are,

Hmm, properly run plcs would keep the money in cash reserves than buying negative bonds, you provide the links, the last link I provided, he was called a crackpot when he is clearly a pioneer, with your kind of thinking buying negative bonds thank goodness I have taken my money out, at least...

Your statement does not hold water, you may have bought short dated paper however any board of a plc would be sacked by the shareholders for a guaranteed loss in the bond markets and locking up capital over the long term, why is it that the ecb holds over 2.5 trillion of government bonds bought...

Would you buy government debt at a negative yield if you were in the private sector, just asking?

To answer your question, the ecb is the only entity buying negative yielding bonds in the eurozone, the ecb were mandated to purchase 40% of government bonds however in a recent statement the bond market is open ended, There are no bids from the private sector (excluding mandated pension funds)...

Socialism is all but dead wolfie, they have run out of others people's money, the last hurra is the printing press, the private sector will return to the barter system or will find a different way to do business, good luck

I have given my personal point of view which I got slated for, however we have heard from the media regarding the un climate summit in New York recently. I did not here about the 500 climate scientists and professionals with 15 from Ireland (I could be wrong) (CLINTEL) sending a letter to the...

I have giving my point of view, I do not believe any of the information provided by both sides. I have stated many times you have to research all the information to get a balanced point of view, I do not supply links to prove or disprove facts or opinions, however here is a link against climate...

The CIA and the FBI really, you forgot Jessica fletcher, she was into climate change as she cycled everywhere.

Let's get something straight I never mentioned anything about the famine, I supplied a link to a source for an alternative view. The source made the connection not me. I showed a link to volcanic activity, if you are interested in the alternative view to get a balanced opinion I suggest spending...

Hyperbole and ignorance really,consequences for our species wow, is it hyperbole that the best scientists available to Al gore stating that new York will be under water or is the stuff of science fiction, clearly beyond all doubt they were wrong. You clearly side stepped a response to that. I...

Can you say as a matter of fact or scientific fact what the climate will be in 2050, the answer is simply no you cannot. You have your scientific opinion and I have mine, we will never agree and that's fine by me

It's not about Armstrong and his ilk Leo, it's about the information and is it science fiction or science fact or weather what Al gore's boys and girls are saying is an inconvenient truth. Nor is about showing links to disprove others opinions, people will believe what they want too believe...

It's not about being right, heaven knows I am wrong on a lot of things, I do believe in climate change as its cyclical in nature, I feel its been ramed down our throats, when the likes of Al gore make statements with the support of the best scientists available who do we believe, were are the...

Unproven therioes, did you actually look at the information available on his website, the answer is simply no as there was not enough time since my last post, as I have said before Al gore the u.s vp with all the best scientists available said new York would be under water by 2012, or maybe...

You have to do your research on all the facts. Here is one source, Armstrong economics /climate change - volcanoes part 2 December 2017 or just look at his whole blog on climate change. If you need more sources let me know as it's important to get all the information for a balanced view, I hope...

Co2 levels have been higher before industrialised times the ice core samples taken from Antarctica prove this beyond doubt, I have studied this topic for years and have come to my conclusion in a balanced way,we could be here for years debating this issue, a lot of people do not agree with me...

They no more than Al gore's scientists also

Yes Leo I can show you articles to say I am right, volcanos have put more co2 into the atmosphere in the earth's history that fossil fuels in the last 100 years, plant more trees to compensate for it