Search results

  1. T

    CA24 Part 8 beneficiary question

    So would you agree its a plausible way to avoid inheritance tax? Alternatively, could the 6 people be named as beneficiaries and then apartment simply sold for same price?
  2. T

    CA24 Part 4 question on mortgage

    Thanks Thirsty. I realise its a dangerous option alright.. not necessarily one we'll take.
  3. T

    CA24 Part 4 question on mortgage

    No I haven't made anything up. Putting 6 people on the deed is a hypothetical option that we have, and I'm merely trying to see if it's plausible or not. To which I haven't gotten any feedback except, 'don't do it' and 'get a solicitor'.
  4. T

    CA24 Part 4 question on mortgage

    It's a hypothetical solution, but thanks for the advice
  5. T

    CA24 Part 4 question on mortgage

    Why? Apart from the obvious reasons
  6. T

    CA24 Part 8 beneficiary question

    I got mixed up thinking about 'order of who would be appointed administrator. Yes they'd all be entitled. Is that scenario plausible?
  7. T

    CA24 Part 8 beneficiary question

    sorry yes, they are all entitled.
  8. T

    CA24 Part 8 beneficiary question

    Yes, all would be entitled. Say decided that way 'first' person entitled on intestacy
  9. T

    CA24 Part 8 beneficiary question

    Situation: Assets amount to total of a single apartment worth 195,000e . No will. It is not intention to sell the apartment. Question: Could 6 group B beneficiaries be named to inherit 32,500e each (right up to tax free allowance). Therefore 6x 32,500 = 195,000e. The deed/ownership of the...
  10. T

    CA24 Part 4 question on mortgage

    Hi, I'm filling out a CA24 form and for Part 4 'Property in the State passing under the Will/Intestacy of the deceased' I have a question. Situation: Deceased owned apartment worth 300,000. Mortgage balance 90,000. Question: For Part 4 section 1 (Gross market value at the date of death of...
Back
Top