2. Also should I ask them to reduce the capital but keep the term of the mortgage the same or should I ask them to keep the repayments the same? Do not understand the difference between the two options. Would be grateful if someone could explain it to me.
Thanks
This is probably easier to explain with an example (this is generic across all Bank's - I'm not sure what UB's default treatment of a lump sum is)
Take a 200k mortgage at 3% over 20 years.
My normal repayment amount is 1,109 per month.
Now, I want to repay 20k early. I've 2 options;
1. Reduce the term, and keep repaying the 1,109 per month, or
2. Keep the term at the remainder of the 20 years, and have a smaller monthly repayment.
example | Original | Reduce Term | Reduce Repayment |
Loan Amount | 200,000 | 180,000 | 180,000 |
Rate | 3% | 3% | 3% |
Term | 20 | 17.5 | 20 |
Repayment | €1,109 | €1,103 | €998 |
Total interest | 66,207 | 51,585 | 59,586 |
If I go with option 1, it will reduce the term to 17.5 years. The mortgage will be repaid 2.5 years early, and has the lowest total interest cost.
With option 2, the monthly repayment reduces to 998 per month (so I've an extra 105 per month), but I've paying interest for a longer term.
Note: if you choose option 1, it is a permanent change to your contract. If you come under financial pressure in the future the bank will not automatically extend the term back out to what it was originally.
Option 2 gives you more flexibility, especially if you are disciplined enough to continue saving the extra 100 per month, and make further lump sum repayments. Or set up an additional standing order that you can cancel anytime you want.
If you make different lump sum repayments over the course of the mortgage, you can choose different treatments for each one.
Edit: I just realised there's really nice calculator tool on the UB website, with a graph.
http://digital.ulsterbank.ie/personal/mortgages/secure/mortgage-overpayment-tool.html