Social partnership to blame for woes..thoughts?

My thoughts .. ?

I agree. When Joe O'Toole referred to Benchmarking as an ATM, you knew something wasn't right.
 
Although technically it predates his tenure, dreadful Bertie-ism. The worst excesses spead like mould during his reign.

Hasty, ill concieved, union pandering madness.

Certainly some of the blame should rest there, yes.
 
Social Partnership led to wage moderation , a huge downturn in days lost to industrial disputes and a decrease in employees tax burdens which led to the advent of our good times.

I think that any role played by social partnership in the severity of our downturn is minimal by comparison to the roles played by our Government , Banks & Developers aided by the lightest of regulatory touches.

Indeed there seems to be a general feeling that we would be well on the road to recovery if it wasn't for our devasting Banking crisis.
 
I think you do have to ask why did wages shoot up so quickly from 1997 to 2007?

My personal opinion is we got into a vicious circle of chasing inflation.

Reckless availability of cheap credit and inflation chasing policies (social partnership included) merged to create a monster.
 
It might have started off as a partnership and to be fair to the unions, they played a big part in building up the Celtic tiger. But let's be honest here, it stopped being a partnership a long time ago. The unions were simply bought off by lazy incompetent politicians. The union leadership became more interested in sticking their noses on the trough than doing their job. All one needs to look at is how many boards consist of trade union leaders and yet all we hear about is FF/property developer cronyism.
 
I would point out that although SIPTU officials serve on various boards they are precluded by the union's constitution from accepting a salary for such services , either no salary is accepted or the salary is paid into union funds - in any event no individual benefits.

SIPTU is Ireland's largest union.
 
Deiseblue said:
I would point out that although SIPTU officials serve on various boards they are precluded by the union's constitution from accepting a salary for such services , either no salary is accepted or the salary is paid into union funds - in any event no individual benefits.

SIPTU is Ireland's largest union.
Click to expand...

aided by the lightest of regulatory touches.
Click to expand...

Did Mr. Begg ever speak out as a member of the board of the Central Bank?
 
shanegl said:
Did Mr. Begg ever speak out as a member of the board of the Central Bank?
Click to expand...



not to worry, Begg is gone off the CB board. And things have changed radically in this country in how we're going to run things from now on....just look at the new nominees!!!

[broken link removed]

Ooopppss, wait a second....maybe things have'nt changed

Some of Mr Geraghty's CV...from the Sindo 8/09/09:
As a leading proponent of the now ailing social partnership process, Mr Geraghty's career thrived during the boom years with appointments to the RTE Authority, the board of Fas and the National Competitiveness Council all included on his CV.

The one-term member of the European Parliament continues to serve as the Chairman of the Affordable Homes Partnership, while enjoying the benefit of a defined benefit pension from his tenure as Siptu president.
 
Given that wealth of experience Mr. Geraghty sounds like an ideal appointment to me .

The appointment of Mike Soden however leaves me somewhat puzzled , perhaps his first hand knowledge of Internet policy will prove useful.
 
In fairness, Social partnership did deliver industrial peace for a number of years, and perhaps at the start, some of the payrises were merited. Certain things, such as ROS.ie were introduced without too much fuss from unions and this should be recognised. However, as it progressed, I have to question if the price that was paid in latter years was too much, with little to be seen for the taxpayer in return. The money paid to unions for "training" also leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

Perhaps it's biggest legacy it left is the sense of entitlement within the public sector workforce, entitlement to increments and payrises without delivering tangible benifits and reform. I believe that the unions, under social partnership, forgot their social responsibility for society, the taxpayer and the end user of services and the price of this was getting the most in financial terms for their members.
 
I think in terms of this discussion that we should bear in mind that Social Partnership was not a union dominated partnership as IBEC , the government were also involved in the decision making process and presumably had an equal voice.

I would wonder what would have happened if we had reverted to a free for all system of wage negotiation during the boom years - could this have proved disastrous in terms of our current situation ?
 
Deiseblue said:
I would point out that although SIPTU officials serve on various boards they are precluded by the union's constitution from accepting a salary for such services , either no salary is accepted or the salary is paid into union funds - in any event no individual benefits.
Click to expand...

I know of several boards where there is no salay, but instead a stipend which is paid personally along with expenses.

But I actually agree with the good that came from the social partnership outweighing the bad in a lot of cases. Days lost due to indisutrial unrest was a major contributor, as well as all the cemementing of employment law we now enjoy as employees in our organisations (unless a MoF decides to step in and overrule High Court decisions) and it was a mechanism that block off the Thatcher/Reagan politics of the time. In the end it really did become pure trash. The principles of negotiation become completely twisted. It went from here's 20 points that need addressing, let's find a compromise to: here's 20 points that need addressing one side can have their way on 10 and ther other side can have their way on the other 10.

Which leads me to the last point, social partnership had more than one party sat at the table, it wasn't just the unions.
 
Deiseblue said:
I would wonder what would have happened if we had reverted to a free for all system of wage negotiation during the boom years - could this have proved disastrous in terms of our current situation ?
Click to expand...

The context at the time was the UK where Heath proposed a social partnership and it was rejected by the unions there. Thatcher got in, all they had was individual barganing and we see where that got them in the end. I don't think it too much hyperbole that collective barganing served us all well in a good way.
 
Social Partnership had it's merits but was past it's sell-by-date when the Government finally killed it off. It is disingenuous to blame our current situation on Partnership. The Government are to blame for a series of poor decisions, failed policy and a failed financial regulatory system.
 
Latrade said:
Which leads me to the last point, social partnership had more than one party sat at the table, it wasn't just the unions.
Click to expand...

+1 and as I have said before on AAM, from 2004 onwards poverty justice groups had a strong influence on government spending. The social welfare bill grew out of control in this period.

These are the groups that sat in on agreement talks.

  • Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU)
  • Service Industrial Professional and Technical Union
  • Irish Business and Employers’ Confederation (IBEC)
  • Small Firms’ Association (SFA)
  • Irish Exporters’ Association (IEA)
  • Irish Tourist Industry Confederation (ITIC)
  • Irish Hotels Federation
  • Chambers Ireland
  • Irish Farmers’ Association (IFA)
  • Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers’ Association (ICMSA)
  • Irish Co-Operative Organisation Society Ltd. (ICOS)
  • Irish Cattle and Sheep Farmers Association
  • Macra na Feirme
  • Irish National Organisation of the Unemployed (INOU)
  • Congress Centres Network
  • CORI Justice Commission
  • National Youth Council of Ireland (NYCI)
  • National Association of Building Co-Operatives (NABCO)
  • Irish Council for Social Housing (ICSH)
  • Society of Saint Vincent de Paul
  • Age Action Ireland
  • The Carers Association
  • The Wheel
  • The Disability Federation of Ireland
  • Irish Rural Link
  • The Irish Senior Citizens’ Parliament
  • The Children’s Rights Alliance
  • Protestant Aid
  • Community Platform
  • National Women's Council of Ireland
  • Environmental Pillar
[broken link removed]
 
The only people who should have a say in how the country is run are the Td's elected by the people. The Dail and most of the government have had no real power for the last 10 years as the country was run/carved up by the social partners, dominated by IBEC and SIPTU, and the Department of the Taoiseach. Basically That meant Bertie sitting back and letting unelected vested interest groups look after their own interests at the expense of the people who elected his government to govern. Brian Cowan has been a disaster as leader but the damage was done by Bertie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top