canicemcavoy
Registered User
- Messages
- 601
The draft NAMA legislation includes the following:
The problem is - how can such a panel enjoy any public confidence? Unless those appointed to it from either banking or property sectors can prove a track record of being critical of bubble-era prices, then their judgement is proven to be flawed.
96.—(1) There shall be a valuation panel to adjudicate on disputes referred to it by NAMA under section 72 and section 76.
(2) The valuation panel shall consist of such, and such numbers of (not exceeding 12) persons as the Minister determines and appoints to be members of it.
(3) The Minister shall appoint a person as a member of the valuation panel only if the Minister is of the opinion that the person has relevant expertise or specialist knowledge.
(4) The terms and conditions of appointment (including remuneration and reimbursement of expenses incurred) of a member of the valuation panel shall be as the Minister determines
The problem is - how can such a panel enjoy any public confidence? Unless those appointed to it from either banking or property sectors can prove a track record of being critical of bubble-era prices, then their judgement is proven to be flawed.