Here is our situation, any comments would be welcome.
Took out tracker with UB in 05. Went fixed for two years in 06-08. Signed form like Karolina 's first form referring to banks Home Loan rate at end of fixed term. Presumed that it meant tracker, probably, but didn't 't think a lot about it, as trackers weren't under the spotlight much then.
Summer 08, fixed term ended. Letter from bank said that we would now roll to SVR (this defined Banks Home Loan rate for us), UNLESS we opted to (a) fix again, and if we did we would still have the flexibility to explore our options at the end, OR (b) return to our tracker.
From this we deduced that banks Home loan rate as signed by us in the first FIxed Rate Authority form meant SVR, and seemed to be a generic default rate, but we had been given the option to go back on the tracker rate, so no worries.
We opted to fix for five years, signing the new form, like Karolina's second form, now referring to SVR at end of fixed rate. Our take on this was that since Home Loan rate meant SVR and we signed that the first time and still could go back to tracker as a option, we were signing up to the same as before, the words had changed but it meant the same thing.
Of course, last summer the option to return to tracker was omitted. Wrote to UB, made our case, got final response letter refusing to re-instate tracker. Have case with FSO now, were offered mediation but bank refused. In summary, our case stands on this: we entered the exact same process twice, signed off on the same form in meaning both times, the first time were given the chance to return to original rate, and the second time we were not.
The bank is saying that trackers are no longer available and we signed a clear form stating that loan would be SVR at end.
Any similar stories out there?
Took out tracker with UB in 05. Went fixed for two years in 06-08. Signed form like Karolina 's first form referring to banks Home Loan rate at end of fixed term. Presumed that it meant tracker, probably, but didn't 't think a lot about it, as trackers weren't under the spotlight much then.
Summer 08, fixed term ended. Letter from bank said that we would now roll to SVR (this defined Banks Home Loan rate for us), UNLESS we opted to (a) fix again, and if we did we would still have the flexibility to explore our options at the end, OR (b) return to our tracker.
From this we deduced that banks Home loan rate as signed by us in the first FIxed Rate Authority form meant SVR, and seemed to be a generic default rate, but we had been given the option to go back on the tracker rate, so no worries.
We opted to fix for five years, signing the new form, like Karolina's second form, now referring to SVR at end of fixed rate. Our take on this was that since Home Loan rate meant SVR and we signed that the first time and still could go back to tracker as a option, we were signing up to the same as before, the words had changed but it meant the same thing.
Of course, last summer the option to return to tracker was omitted. Wrote to UB, made our case, got final response letter refusing to re-instate tracker. Have case with FSO now, were offered mediation but bank refused. In summary, our case stands on this: we entered the exact same process twice, signed off on the same form in meaning both times, the first time were given the chance to return to original rate, and the second time we were not.
The bank is saying that trackers are no longer available and we signed a clear form stating that loan would be SVR at end.
Any similar stories out there?
