Plan to retire in 7 years, is it feasible?

Yes I agree. I was late starting a pension (early 30s). I made the decision to favour paying off the mortgage because I was alarmed at the pension levy which was introduced and my thinking was they could do worse in the coming years. As it turns out they didnt. I would rather own my own house outright, there was a lot of uncertainty after 2008 about the housing market, ability to repay mortgages etc.... Anyway my pension performance was awful in the years 2007 - 2017. I took it under my own control and ploughed it all into global equities (thanks to the good advice here) and since then it is actually doing well. Its an interesting topic - which to favour?

That’s really interesting.

Two misguided strategies which have led to a poorer outcome.

1) The pension levy is an irrelevance and should not colour people’s analysis

2) Maximise pension before paying down one’s mortgage is the correct approach all other things being equal
 
Have you explored the possibility of changing roles for a less busy/stressful one instead of full on retiring? I totally get the burnout and the desire to retire early and use the hopefully healthy/energetic years.

But is there any opportunity to say do part time consulting work in your fields, or even retrain as something you always thought you would like to earn some income for a few years and keep you just busy enough to not burn through as much cash? You could try this and stop if it doesn't work. Like of working in an ice cream shop or tour guide in your preferred holiday destination etc.
I am confident I can fill a week with my own hobbies and interests. I am amazed at people who say they would be bored in retirement. Working in any capacity would be a last resort for both of us. But each to their own.
 
Thanks everyone for very informative and interesting points. At this stage we are only planning. We are 7 years away from planned retirement so a lot can happen in between. Its good to discuss these points ahead of time. I am an avid planner. Sometimes planning something is as enjoyable as doing it :) I will look back at these comments in the coming years and see how things tracked vs what I had planned.
 
@homeowner

1. How much are you contributing to your pension monthly in terms AVCs to max it out? At a cost to you is that 1725? I am looking at your take home pay vs my monthly take home pay (similar salary levels), and your take home seems too high if you were both maxing out contributions.

The relevant question to ask is when did you pay off your mortgage and start to max out AVCs and what is your employers contribution to pension?

If you are both adding 34,500 (115k *0.3) to your pension pot a year for the next 7 years that is 500k into the pension pot given a total (excluding growth) of 1.2m Eur. Plus an estimated ~500k of savings +200k of shares + future shares. Am I missing something?

What I am missing here, that says you can't retire early?
 
You can if you’re 51 like these posters.

But in any event, that’s not a sensible reason to neglect pension funding.

But these posters don't have a mortgage.....

You said maximising pension contributions is the correct approach vs overpaying mortgage. Not contributing to a pension at all is not sensible, but there is risk for the majority of people of not being able to afford their mortgage payments should they lose their jobs prior to being able to access private pensions at 50.

The majority of people use two incomes these days to get a mortgage, losing an income reduces ability to service that debt. The prudent approach is to overpay your mortgage to a level the monthly repayments are sustainable on one income before focusing on maximising pension avcs. Alternative approach is to build a rainy day fund to cover mortgage payments.

I just don't think it is a black and white case of one approach vs the other. This is just my opinion :)
 
But these posters don't have a mortgage.....

You said maximising pension contributions is the correct approach vs overpaying mortgage. Not contributing to a pension at all is not sensible, but there is risk for the majority of people of not being able to afford their mortgage payments should they lose their jobs prior to being able to access private pensions at 50.

The majority of people use two incomes these days to get a mortgage, losing an income reduces ability to service that debt. The prudent approach is to overpay your mortgage to a level the monthly repayments are sustainable on one income before focusing on maximising pension avcs. Alternative approach is to build a rainy day fund to cover mortgage payments.

I just don't think it is a black and white case of one approach vs the other. This is just my opinion :)

They don’t have a mortgage most likely because they’ve prioritised that over pension!

Note my use of “all other things being equal”
 
I have often thought of that too. At the moment the company is going through high growth and we will either be acquired in the next 5 years or we will be market leaders, at least that is the thinking. Our shares are doing well. My personal view is cashing them in now is the wrong time. I will be reassessing in the coming years. The 200K is a projection of my current shares which have vested plus the ones that will vest in the coming 2 years at today's market price after tax is paid. It is conservative and not accounting for the price going up which I am confident it will going by what I know of our plans. I will also be getting similar tranches yearly for as long as I am there which I have not factored in either. However nothing is certain in life as we all know. What would I do with 200K in cash if I cashed them in is another question that is on my mind.

In case you are not aware, you will also have to pay capital gain tax when you eventually sell your shares which is tax on the profit made between the price they vested at and the price you sold them at.
 
Back
Top