Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,792
For simplicity, let's assume you have a case identical to the other cases. You broke out of a fixed rate before the end of the period, and ptsb put you on an SVR.
Let's say you broke out in January 2009 - 6 years would bring you to January 2015, so it's over 6 years since you broke out. Are you too late to make a complaint?
Wait until you hear the outcome of the Central Bank review
If the Central Bank finds that ptsb deliberately attempted to entice people off their trackers, then I would imagine that they will be told to review all cases and to ignore the 6 year time limit.
If ptsb says you are not entitled to your tracker...
In my opinion, you can still take a case to the Ombudsman. If your contract says that you are entitled to a tracker, then you should be on a tracker. Under the Central Bank Act which set up the Ombudsman, the complaint has to be made within 6 years of the behaviour complained of. However, if it's ongoing behaviour, the complaint has to be made within 6 years of the behaviour complained of ceasing.
In my view, the behaviour complained of is the charging of the SVR, which they are still doing. So you should be able to make a complaint and go back 6 years from the date of the complaint for a refund.
The Ombudsman may take a different view and say that the behaviour complained of was the failure to offer you a tracker. However, if the Ombudsman takes that view, it should be challenged.
Let's say you broke out in January 2009 - 6 years would bring you to January 2015, so it's over 6 years since you broke out. Are you too late to make a complaint?
Wait until you hear the outcome of the Central Bank review
If the Central Bank finds that ptsb deliberately attempted to entice people off their trackers, then I would imagine that they will be told to review all cases and to ignore the 6 year time limit.
If ptsb says you are not entitled to your tracker...
In my opinion, you can still take a case to the Ombudsman. If your contract says that you are entitled to a tracker, then you should be on a tracker. Under the Central Bank Act which set up the Ombudsman, the complaint has to be made within 6 years of the behaviour complained of. However, if it's ongoing behaviour, the complaint has to be made within 6 years of the behaviour complained of ceasing.
In my view, the behaviour complained of is the charging of the SVR, which they are still doing. So you should be able to make a complaint and go back 6 years from the date of the complaint for a refund.
The Ombudsman may take a different view and say that the behaviour complained of was the failure to offer you a tracker. However, if the Ombudsman takes that view, it should be challenged.