ESRI: 2/3rds of people living in houses too big for their needs

downsizing is a touchy subject - a few politicians have mentioned it in recent years and immediately been torn to pieces for "trying to force old people out of their homes". The main issue is there are very few suitable properties for older people to move into, they don't want small apartments where their neighbours are all short-term renters. There's also issues around financing, and I suppose general inertia. But there's undeniably a lot of older couples rattling around in large family homes that cost a fortune to maintain. I get the impression in other countries (the UK for example) it's more common to downsize in later life.
Actually a lot of older people quite like living in apartments - no gardening, someone else cleans the gutters, windows, looks after the exterior. But there's very limited options that are good for people like that.
Its the same thing as the effort to cater for tenants after 2010 - any slightest hint from a government and they were immediately accused of trying to turn the population into a nation of people owning nothing.
 
The bedroom tax is not a tax, its a reduction in the amount of housing benefit paid to social tenants in the UK who have more rooms than people in their homes. It was actually a rehash of a Brown-era labour policy called "Local Housing Allowance", the idea was that the housing benefit amount paid would be on the basis of family size not the size of the property. It never applied to owner occupiers.
 
Are you sure?

Practically all newly built one-off houses over the last 20 years are at least 150 sqm, more like 200 sqm.

Okay, in estates, there are plenty of 3-bed semis which are sub 150 sqm, yes.

But 95% seems too high.
 
Back
Top