"Charge is a Statute - So Don't Register"

[pudds]

This is being emailed around and asked to be forwarded, any truth in this at all folks.

[SIZE=-0]“You won’t get a bill because the charge is a Statute. People need to understand this: A Statute is a “legislated rule of society given the force of law by the consent of the governed.”(Black’s Law Dictionary 4th edition). Who are those it governs? Us, the public.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-0]
This household charge is a Statute, otherwise known as an Act of Government and only carries the force of law upon you if you consent to it which means that you are legally obliged to pay if you consent or in other words go on to householdcharge.ie and register.
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-0]Your silence and inaction will also give the appearance of no consent. If you do not consent, a Statute cannot affect you in any way whatsoever.

The courts know this and the last thing they will do is tell you. In fact they will hide this from you at every opportunity they can. On the other hand, if you tell them, they will accept it because they know it is actually true.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-0] According to the above definitions a statutory instrument is a contract. If you register for this “charge”
you are consenting to this statute ie: signing the contract. This is why the Government are ASKING the people to register and not just billing[/SIZE] them.

 

[rameire]

rape, child molestation and child pornography are also covered under statutes, if the above were true the three examples would not be illegal.

 

[Brendan Burgess]

A superb article here by Fergal Crehan, barrister.

Unlike most conspiracy theories, which are based on wilful misinterpretations of actual facts, much of the Freeman theory is entirely made up.

We don’t need to enter any contract to be subject to laws. The Social Contract doesn’t exist, it is a metaphor. You might as well ask to see the captain of the Ship of State, or demand a swatch of the Fabric of Society. But then Freemen are oddly literal-minded, as Mr. Bobby Sludds displayed recently.
Mr. Sludds, or “Bobby of the Family Sludds”, as he prefers (this is another Freeman quirk. They don’t accept the names The Man gives them) was charged in Wexford District Court with the latest in an impressive string of traffic offences. He demanded to see the judge’s oath, though an oath is a form of words, not a physical object. He went on to deny there was any such person as “Boddy Sludds” and shortly thereafter found himself in Cloverhill prison. It took an application to the High Court (this time playing by the rules) and an admission as to his identity before he walked free. He was later convicted of all charges. The State may be a fictional entity, but it owns the prisons, and they are all too real.

 

[ang1170]

Priceless! Best quote I've seen in a long time: "State may be a fictional entity, but it owns the prisons, and they are all too real"

 

[csirl]

I actually dont agree with Fergal Crehan on entering a contract to be subject to laws. We live in a democracy. We elect the Dail and give them delegated authority to make laws on our behalf. Surely there is something contractually binding in us adhering to laws that our representatives have introduced?

 

[tvman]

I actually dont agree with Fergal Crehan on entering a contract to be subject to laws. We live in a democracy. We elect the Dail and give them delegated authority to make laws on our behalf. Surely there is something contractually binding in us adhering to laws that our representatives have introduced?

That's what he's saying - you don't need to enter into a contract to be bound by a law.