I know that the PRSI/health levy thresholds were calculated on a weekly or monthly basis. Is this still the same for 2010 ?
I ask because ,as we all know, there is that ridiculous threshold at 500 euros a week when ,if someone gets a 2% increase -25 euros -they actually get less in their hands.
A crazy siTutaion that has existed -at differing thresholds- for years.
Bluntly, if I increase someones salary from 25.000 to 30.000 it is costing me 5.000 (plus employers liability - about an extra 5.537). But the employee only gets 1800 extra.
That is, it costs me 5.537 to give someone 1.800 !!
(have I got my sums wrong -it seems too crazy ?)
Obviously it would be quite wrong of me to give the employee an official salary of 25k and bung 2k in their hands -even though it would save me 3k and the employee still gets the same as if officially paid 30k
So, is it O.K. to pay someone under the threshold each month - ca. 2.166
for eleven months? And on the twelve month -December -give them just over 6k -total 30k ?
Obviously on that 6k the employee take a hit -having passed the threshold. But on the overall year he/she loses far less than if paid 600 each week.
But would Revenue say - "the total annual salary was 30k and so in fact the average monthly salary was 600 ,thus the employee owes us the levy for each of the preceding 11 months" ??
I ask because ,as we all know, there is that ridiculous threshold at 500 euros a week when ,if someone gets a 2% increase -25 euros -they actually get less in their hands.
A crazy siTutaion that has existed -at differing thresholds- for years.
Bluntly, if I increase someones salary from 25.000 to 30.000 it is costing me 5.000 (plus employers liability - about an extra 5.537). But the employee only gets 1800 extra.
That is, it costs me 5.537 to give someone 1.800 !!
(have I got my sums wrong -it seems too crazy ?)
Obviously it would be quite wrong of me to give the employee an official salary of 25k and bung 2k in their hands -even though it would save me 3k and the employee still gets the same as if officially paid 30k
So, is it O.K. to pay someone under the threshold each month - ca. 2.166
for eleven months? And on the twelve month -December -give them just over 6k -total 30k ?
Obviously on that 6k the employee take a hit -having passed the threshold. But on the overall year he/she loses far less than if paid 600 each week.
But would Revenue say - "the total annual salary was 30k and so in fact the average monthly salary was 600 ,thus the employee owes us the levy for each of the preceding 11 months" ??