I
Inquitus
Guest
Alot of people, myself included, are living with young kids in inappropriate areas or in inappropriate housing types (i.e. apartments with young kids)
My wife and I were looking at the idea of renting out the family home, and renting ourselves a house in a better location for the kids to be able to play on a green etc.
We are in negative equity, although not as much as some, but would be unable to sell the house and buy elsewhere at this juncture.
I have looked into this and it seems that we have to pay tax on the rental income and can only deduct 70% of the Interest portion of the mortgage. On top of this we will have to maintain the house, insure it and pay a letting agency. This would mean, despite being able to attract a rental income equivalent to the mortgage repayments, that we would be left with a significant annual shortfall to pay out of our own pockets.
Is my understanding of things correct? and does the government have any plans to do anything about this situation, perhaps making rental income from your family home exempt from tax or similar?
I know a number of people stuck in apartments etc. who are stuck in negative equity but earn enough to move via renting as outlined above, or if it were possible move the negative equity portion onto the next property were financial institutions offering such products. This seems a rather contrary situation.
My wife and I were looking at the idea of renting out the family home, and renting ourselves a house in a better location for the kids to be able to play on a green etc.
We are in negative equity, although not as much as some, but would be unable to sell the house and buy elsewhere at this juncture.
I have looked into this and it seems that we have to pay tax on the rental income and can only deduct 70% of the Interest portion of the mortgage. On top of this we will have to maintain the house, insure it and pay a letting agency. This would mean, despite being able to attract a rental income equivalent to the mortgage repayments, that we would be left with a significant annual shortfall to pay out of our own pockets.
Is my understanding of things correct? and does the government have any plans to do anything about this situation, perhaps making rental income from your family home exempt from tax or similar?
I know a number of people stuck in apartments etc. who are stuck in negative equity but earn enough to move via renting as outlined above, or if it were possible move the negative equity portion onto the next property were financial institutions offering such products. This seems a rather contrary situation.