Just how mind-numbingly stupid is our Tainiste Joan Burton? Judging by her antics at Farmleigh recently I think she is neck-and-neck with the likes of Sarah Palin in the stupidity stakes.
Just what was on her mind when she allowed herself to be photographed beside a mock-up giant “reefer telescope”? Most assuredly not affairs of State despite the comments in the Sunday Worst. Our second most senior politician, Inda’s under-study Gawd help us seemed to think, or not as the case may be, it’s OK to do a drugs promo.
Would Joan have allowed herself to be photographed beside a mock-up of a bottle of poteen or would that be a step too far as poteen is illegal and dangerous and costs the State money in lost excise duty & VAT? And then there’s the small matter of that enormous drink problem we have as a nation.
Would Joan have allowed herself to be photographed beside a mocked-up syringe of heroin or a plaster of paris line of coke or amphetamine? Or a “legal high”? Of course not because we have a serious drugs problem in this country.
Would Joan have allowed herself to pictured with a giant cigarette or would this be seen to undermine the Government's anti-smoking policy and to disrespect the thousands of citizens who die each year from tobacco-related illnesses?
So why is it OK for Joan to pictured with the “maga-spliff telescope”? I can’t answer that but my view is that it’s not and because Joan also broke the law. It is illegal for any citizen of the State to take part in an activity that could be construed as promoting the sale or consumption of an illegal substance.
Goodbye Joan. Do the decent thing and resign. We won’t miss you and no doubt Inda won’t miss you either.
[broken link removed]
Just what was on her mind when she allowed herself to be photographed beside a mock-up giant “reefer telescope”? Most assuredly not affairs of State despite the comments in the Sunday Worst. Our second most senior politician, Inda’s under-study Gawd help us seemed to think, or not as the case may be, it’s OK to do a drugs promo.
Would Joan have allowed herself to be photographed beside a mock-up of a bottle of poteen or would that be a step too far as poteen is illegal and dangerous and costs the State money in lost excise duty & VAT? And then there’s the small matter of that enormous drink problem we have as a nation.
Would Joan have allowed herself to be photographed beside a mocked-up syringe of heroin or a plaster of paris line of coke or amphetamine? Or a “legal high”? Of course not because we have a serious drugs problem in this country.
Would Joan have allowed herself to pictured with a giant cigarette or would this be seen to undermine the Government's anti-smoking policy and to disrespect the thousands of citizens who die each year from tobacco-related illnesses?
So why is it OK for Joan to pictured with the “maga-spliff telescope”? I can’t answer that but my view is that it’s not and because Joan also broke the law. It is illegal for any citizen of the State to take part in an activity that could be construed as promoting the sale or consumption of an illegal substance.
Goodbye Joan. Do the decent thing and resign. We won’t miss you and no doubt Inda won’t miss you either.
[broken link removed]