dubinamerica
Registered User
- Messages
- 475
Recently sat an aptitude test for the public sector, consisiting of two exams.
In the documentation provided beforehand, stated that candidates would be required to get a minimum in one test, and only other test would be used for merit placement. This has not occurred, and both tests have been used in merit placement. A recruitment manager has advised that there was a mistake in booklet.
I'm not satisfied with this as this has impacted my merit placement significantly.
Is anyone familiar with procedures in relation to to this area? If they have advertised scoring in a particular way, do they need to adhere to that?
If they won't rerun the results to get new merit placements, what avenues are open to me. I feel that changes after the fact may bias certain candidates and really throws the whole process into question.
Even if it appears to make sense to use both test results, they didn't publish that information, so are they bound to use what was published?
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
In the documentation provided beforehand, stated that candidates would be required to get a minimum in one test, and only other test would be used for merit placement. This has not occurred, and both tests have been used in merit placement. A recruitment manager has advised that there was a mistake in booklet.
I'm not satisfied with this as this has impacted my merit placement significantly.
Is anyone familiar with procedures in relation to to this area? If they have advertised scoring in a particular way, do they need to adhere to that?
If they won't rerun the results to get new merit placements, what avenues are open to me. I feel that changes after the fact may bias certain candidates and really throws the whole process into question.
Even if it appears to make sense to use both test results, they didn't publish that information, so are they bound to use what was published?
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.